Comparison: CPU & GPU Usage of 4 Browsers

How do popular browsers differ in compute footprint when running animations? In this article I am comparing the CPU as well as the GPU utilization of Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Microsoft Internet Explorer and Mozilla Firefox. To make things more interesting I tested GPU performance on Nvdia and Intel.

The Test Scenario

All those four browsers did was render an animation involving fading images on

Test Environment

All four browsers were running simultaneously on a Lenovo W540 equipped with Intel HD Graphics 4600 and Nvidia Quadro K1100M. Nvidias Optimus technology allows the user to control which applications have access to the Nvidia GPU. All other applications, including Desktop Window Manager and other OS components get the Intel GPU.

Browser versions used (latest at the time of writing):

  • Chrome 51.0.2704.103
  • Edge 25.10586.0.0
  • Firefox 47.0
  • Internet Explorer 11.420.10586.0

Measuring CPU and GPU Usage

All measurements were taken with our user experience and application performance monitoring product uberAgent. uberAgent determines GPU utilization per process, which is perfect for this kind of analysis. All I had to do was have the four browsers concurrently run identical workloads and look at uberAgent’s dashboards afterwards.

The following screenshot from uberAgent’s dashboards shows average GPU compute utilization with Intel HD Graphics 4600:

Process-GPU - Intel



The following table shows the CPU and GPU compute utilization per browser while each browser was configured with the Nvidia GPU.

Browser CPU (avg. %) GPU compute (avg. %)
Chrome 1.1 6.2
Edge 0.5 22.1
Firefox 1.0 7.7
Internet Explorer 0.8 23.0


The following table shows the CPU and GPU compute utilization per browser while each browser was configured with the Intel GPU.

Browser CPU (avg. %) GPU compute (avg. %)
Chrome 1.0 4.6
Edge 0.5 10.7
Firefox 1.0 26.7
Internet Explorer 0.9 10.1

Intel vs. Nvidia

The following table shows the combined CPU / GPU compute utilization of all four browsers.

GPU CPU – all 4 browsers (avg. %) GPU compute – all 4 browsers (avg. %)
Nvidia 3.3 59.0
Intel 3.4 52.1


There is no clear winner, rather we can observe different strategies being used by the four browsers’ developers. Edge offloads the largest part of the workload to the GPU, but that comes at the prices of high GPU utilization. Chrome, on the other hand, requires about twice the CPU resources, but in return uses GPU resources economically.

Whether it is better to use CPU or GPU resources first depends very much on the situation at hand. With laptops a deciding factor would be overall energy consumption (which I did not look at in this article).

CPU utilization is not affected by switching the Nvidia for the Intel GPU. Interestingly, the GPU utilization per browser changes significantly. Even though the Nvidia GPU nominally is much more powerful Edge and Internet Explorer need more than twice the GPU resources compared to the Intel GPU. With Firefox it is the other way round. Apparently the efficiency of the browser vendors’ GPU implementations depend more on the driver and the type of optimization than on raw hardware power.

Please bear in mind that these results are valid only for this one test case. With a different workload the numbers might be very different.

, , , ,

3 Responses to Comparison: CPU & GPU Usage of 4 Browsers

  1. Trentent July 7, 2016 at 07:46 #

    What’s the wattage of the CPU vs. GPU? Porportionally, what’s the wattage consumption?

    Why do your results show Chrome is using significantly less CPU/GPU vs. Edge/iExplore but various battery tests show the latter has longer life? Does the % change when battery is turned on (eg, ie/edge tuned for battery Chrome is not?)?

    Something seems weird.

  2. John S November 13, 2017 at 23:32 #

    Was surprised to see Edge consumer more GPU in results. Interesting that it favors this apparently and why maybe it does worse on weaker hardware? Chrome to me has had some of this issue too, with some users complaining of performance on Celeron’s and Atom’s that Google’s forums generally recommend those users disable hardware acceleration. Few years back many felt the hardware acceleration default was set for devices that really were boarder line able to use it. I would like to see a comparison some time on using hardware acceleration vs not using it.

  3. George March 22, 2018 at 10:21 #

    The thing is that higher GPU usage will result in less battery life with Laptops. If you can achieve the same results with less GPU usage, then you’re clearly the winner. But, that’s just my opinion.

Leave a Reply