Citrix Profile Management Architecture - Why it is Not Based on a Mandatory Profile Any More

Ron Kuper asked in a comment why the architecture of Citrix Profile Management was changed from being based on mandatory profiles to capturing the entire profile content by default. This change happened between versions 1 and 2.

A Bit of History

Citrix Profile Management is based on the product sepagoPROFILE, which I architected and co-developed. sepagoPROFILE was a differencing solution based on a mandatory profile, i.e. the product identified which parts of the file system and registry were changed during a user session and stored those deltas in a dedicated directory per user. The reasoning behind this was that file server space would be saved since only partial copies of each profile had to be stored.

This proved to be wrong.

Mandatory profiles are typically very small. The size of a mandatory profile is negligible compared to what gets stored individually, per user, during the lifetime of a profile.

Downsides of Mandatory Profiles

With this reason pro mandatory profiles out of the way, let us have a look at the cons:

  • Merging large amounts of data into the registry at logon can be slow. This prolongs logons.
  • Scanning the registry for changes takes time. This prolongs logoffs.
  • Creating a mandatory profile is not as easy as it sounds. This complicates deployments.
  • There is no easy migration path from existing local and roaming profiles. This also complicates deployments.

Central Management of User Settings

We felt that these downsides outweighed the only really remaining advantage of an architecture based on mandatory profiles: the ability to centrally configure the user environment by changing registry values or placing icons on the desktop.

Additionally, there a much better ways to centrally manage user environments than by tweaking a mandatory profile. Either use Microsoft’s Group Policy Preferences or one of the alternatives from third-party vendors.

Switching Architectures

When sepagoPROFILE was acquired by Citrix in 2008 both teams felt that this was the perfect (and only, really) time to change architectures. While a rebranded sepagoPROFILE was released as a beta version of Citrix User Profile Manager (UPM), we modified the code to work with local profiles. That version was released as Citrix User Profile Manager 2.

Thus UPM version 1 never really existed. The first “official” version was version 2.

CitrixCitrix Profile ManagementUser Profile ManagerUser Profiles

Comments

Related Posts

Citrix User Profile Manager (UPM) and the Broken Rootdrive

Citrix User Profile Manager (UPM) and the Broken Rootdrive
Terminal server application compatibility scripts have been around for a long time - so long in fact, that I considered them a legacy and stowed away any knowledge of them in a very remote area of my brain. When a Citrix customer brought up a problem with the mapping of ROOTDRIVE in the User Profile Manager forum, at first I had no clue what he was talking about. Luckily, the customer was able to pin the problem down to a specific command that failed when, and only when, User Profile Manager was processing the logon. This is the story of UsrLogon.cmd, ACRegL.exe and UPM.
User Profiles

Citrix User Profile Manager 5 Years Ago: Birth

Citrix User Profile Manager 5 Years Ago: Birth
Citrix User Profile Manager is pretty well-known in the SBC space today. Five years ago, things were quite different. Citrix did not have a user profile solution, and neither did sepago. But we had an idea spinning in our heads we soon came to call Smooth Profiles. Slowly that idea became code, then was renamed to sepagoPROFILE, was acquired by Citrix and renamed again to User Profile Manager and then again to Profile management (with capital P and lower-case m!). You may have heard the latter part of the story. Here is a little something from the very beginning.
User Profiles

Latest Posts

Beautiful Slide Decks from Markdown: Presenting with Slidev

Beautiful Slide Decks from Markdown: Presenting with Slidev
Would you like to get away from PowerPoint and author slide decks in Markdown? Then Slidev may be just what you’re looking for. It’s a web app for presentations. The fact that it’s geared towards developers shouldn’t put you off. After all, who isn’t a developer these days, with AI? Slidev comes with the beautiful Tahta themes and supports features like syntax highlighting and animations. Export options to PDF and PPTX allow for easy sharing. This article shows how to get started.
Applications